|
In the investment world, the focus on environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria has generated a hot debate. However, as sustainable investing has gained ground, so has resistance against it. Therefore, in early December 2023, a group of ESG advocates announced a more than $10 million USD campaign in response to growing opposition. This phenomenon, called the anti-ESG movement, reflects an organized and well-funded reaction by responsible investment advocates. With more than 150 bills and opposing resolutions filed in 37 U.S. entities this year, according to a report by law firm Simpson Thatcher, “Unlocking America's Future” seeks a solution. Since ESG criteria are essential to evaluate financial risks and opportunities. But what is being proposed? We tell you! Against ESG advocates The anti-ESG phenomenon has taken shape as a political and legislative response, reflecting a record year of resistance against sustainable investment practices .
As the movement has gained considerable influence, with 40 laws having been enacted in 18 states since 2021, establishing a challenging political environment for ESG advocates. These legislative initiatives have largely been supported by conservative groups such as the American Legislative Council and the Heritage Foundation, who have drafted model proposals that have influenced the formulation of Czech Republic Phone Number List state laws. Among the objections expressed by politicians is resistance to the consideration of environmental, social or governance criteria in public investments, especially in state government pension plans. However, while it has been alleged that sustainable-based investing has underperformed, advocates say the evidence does not support the claim that ESG criteria are linked to lower long-term returns. ESG advocates in the United States What does the anti-ESG movement mean for sustainable development? The anti-ESG movement in the United States is not only a policy showdown, but also a battle that has significant implications for long-term sustainable development.
Therefore, ESG advocates highlight the importance of maintaining a balanced approach that considers both financial results and social and environmental impact. Likewise, at the heart of the debate is concern that the anti-ESG movement could slow progress towards a more sustainable economy. Since ESG criteria not only seek financial returns, but also promote business practices that promote equity, transparency and environmental responsibility. By dismissing these criteria, critics could inadvertently weaken incentives for companies to adopt more sustainable practices. This is why ESG advocates emphasize that responsible investing is not only a matter of ethical values, but also a long-term strategy to mitigate risks and foster economic stability. ESG advocates in the US Should ESG criteria continue to be promoted? ESG advocates argue that, despite resistance and the proliferation of anti-ESG laws, a focus on responsible investing is essential for the financial and sustainable future.
|
|